MAREVA INJUNCTION AND DEBT RECOVERY

The Mareva Injunction has been described as the nuclear weapon of commercial litigation by Donaldson J. in Bank Mellat v. Nikpour (1988) I WLR 1350.In this monograph the Mareva Injunction, Anton Piller Orders, Interim detention of property, Interim attachment of funds before and after judgment and similar procedure in addressed.

The author has discovered that the application of the Mareva Injunction procedure is not well understood in Nigeria hence the need to write this monograph which is a very brief summary of the Mareva procedure and similar procedures

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

MAREVA INJUNCTION

FEATURES OF MAREVA INJUNCTION

HEARING OF APPLICATION IN CHAMBERS

LIFE-SPAN

DISTINCTION BETWEEN EX-PARTE INJUNCTION AND INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTION

CONSTITUTIONALITY OF EX-PARTE MOTINS

THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF INTERIM INJUNCTION

APPLICATION FOR MAREVA INJUNCTION IN URGENT CASES

DELAY DEFEATS INTERIM IJUNCTION

MAREVA INJUNCTION AFTER JUDGMENT

PREPARATION OF ORDER OF MAREVA INJUNCTION

BREACH OF COURT ORDER FOR MAREVA INJUNCTION

GRANT OF MAREVA INJUNCTION BY THE COURT OF APPEAL

WORLD WIDE MAREVA INJUNCTION OR WORLD WIDE FREEZING ORDERS

INTERIM PAYMENT OF DEBT

INTERIM ATTACHMENT OF DEBTOR’S PROPERTY

ANTON PILLER ORDER

THE DUTIES OF A JUDGE IN THE GRANT OF APPLICATION FOR INTERIM AND INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTIONS

CONCLUSION

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.